Not Too Generative, Not Too Discriminative: The Human Alignment Sweet Spot
A central question in computational vision is whether human-like visual representations are better explained by discriminative or generative learning. Existing comparisons, however, often confound the learning objective with architecture, scale, and training data, leaving open whether the objective itself drives alignment. We address this confound using Joint Energy-Based Models (JEMs), which interpolate continuously between discriminative and generative training within a fixed architecture. By
Record details
Published: 22 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Applications of the Transformer Architecture in AI-Assisted English Reading Comprehension
arXiv · 26 April 2026
OceanPile: A Large-Scale Multimodal Ocean Corpus for Foundation Models
arXiv · 25 April 2026
Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Representation Alignment Rests on Linear Structure
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Graph Alignment Topology as an Inductive Bias for Grounding Detection
arXiv · 21 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 May 2026), “Not Too Generative, Not Too Discriminative: The Human Alignment Sweet Spot,” evidence record 3855, https://ethics.ai/record/3855 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.