What Medicine Taught Us About Fairness and What It Missed: Lessons from Reconsidering Race-Specific Lung Function Reference Algorithms
Since 2019, medical societies have reconsidered race-specific clinical equations often in parallel to and largely independent from algorithmic fairness research. Focusing on lung function reference algorithms that affect medical care, insurance, and employment for hundreds of millions globally, we analyze the transition from race-specific GLI-2012 to race-averaged GLI-Global through a fairness lens. Drawing on historical context, citation analysis, and quantitative evaluation, we show (i) limite
Record details
Published: 22 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Jobs & economy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Causal Fairness for Survival Analysis
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Fairness of Explanations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Unifying Framework, Axioms, and Future Direction toward Responsible AI
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias
arXiv · 13 June 2026
AI interventions in cancer screening: balancing equity and cost-effectiveness
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Anterior's Approach to Fairness Evaluation of Automated Prior Authorization System
arXiv · 15 March 2026
Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI
OpenAlex · 3 July 2025
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 May 2026), “What Medicine Taught Us About Fairness and What It Missed: Lessons from Reconsidering Race-Specific Lung Function Reference Algorithms,” evidence record 3851, https://ethics.ai/record/3851 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.