DeGRe: Dense-supervised Generative Reranking for Recommendation
In multi-stage recommender systems, reranking optimizes overall utility by capturing intra-list contextual dependencies, yet its central challenge lies in exploring optimal sequences within an exponentially large permutation space. Recent studies have shifted towards end-to-end generative frameworks, which typically leverage list-wise rewards or preference alignment to guide generator training. However, these methods still face two critical issues. First is the heuristic label bias. Existing met
Record details
Published: 25 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Algorithmic Fragility and Persona Bias in LLM-Generated Autistic Communication
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Language Bias in LVLMs: From In-Depth Analysis to Simple and Effective Mitigation
arXiv · 24 May 2026
When and How Human Curation Backfires: Preference Alignment under Multi-Model Self-Consuming Loop
arXiv · 28 May 2026
Not Too Generative, Not Too Discriminative: The Human Alignment Sweet Spot
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Representation Alignment Rests on Linear Structure
arXiv · 22 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (25 May 2026), “DeGRe: Dense-supervised Generative Reranking for Recommendation,” evidence record 3740, https://ethics.ai/record/3740 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.