EAPO: Entropy-Driven Adaptive Positive-Negative Sample Weighting for Policy Optimization in Open-Ended QA
Large Reasoning Models are typically trained via reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR). However, existing approaches adopt fixed weights for positive and negative samples, and the conclusions hardly generalize to open-ended question answering (QA). In this paper, we systematically investigate the roles of positive and negative samples in reinforcement learning for open-ended QA. We propose a reward-mean-based strategy for distinguishing positive from negative samples, and observe
Record details
Published: 27 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
S-SPPO: Semantic-Calibrated Self-Play Preference Optimization
arXiv · 1 June 2026
Chunking German Legal Code
arXiv · 19 May 2026
Federating Governance: How Community Rules Scale with Mastodon Instances
arXiv · 3 June 2026
Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education
arXiv · 16 May 2026
Quantum Futures Interactive: A Live Demonstration of Post-Quantum Blockchain Security, Infrastructure Tradeoffs, and Sustainable Distributed Trust
arXiv · 15 May 2026
A Practical Recipe Towards Improving Sim-and-Real Correlation for VLA Evaluation
arXiv · 9 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 May 2026), “EAPO: Entropy-Driven Adaptive Positive-Negative Sample Weighting for Policy Optimization in Open-Ended QA,” evidence record 3630, https://ethics.ai/record/3630 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.