Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy, Perceptions, and Performance in a Flipped CS1 Course
This full research paper investigates how engineering students' course-related beliefs relate to exam performance in a flipped introductory programming course. Understanding factors that influence student learning and performance has long been a focus of computing education research. While prior studies have identified psychological and contextually relevant predictors of success, much of this work has examined students majoring in computer science. Yet introductory programming courses now serve
Record details
Published: 31 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Leveraging BART to Assess CS1 C++ Programming Assignments using Rubric-based Criteria
arXiv · 2 June 2026
Rationalize: Shared Semantic Reasoning for Human-AI Alignment
arXiv · 28 May 2026
Practitioner Beliefs and Behaviors in AI-Enhanced Education: DOT Framework Survey Evidence
arXiv · 27 May 2026
Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build
arXiv · 20 May 2026
Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education
arXiv · 16 May 2026
Reimagining Assessment in the Age of Generative AI: Lessons from Open-Book Exams with ChatGPT
arXiv · 12 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (31 May 2026), “Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy, Perceptions, and Performance in a Flipped CS1 Course,” evidence record 3324, https://ethics.ai/record/3324 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.