Are Algorithm Registers Transparent? Perspectives from Germany
Algorithm registers are public-facing databases that display basic information about algorithms employed in public administration. While several such registers exist across Europe and globally, their capacity to deliver meaningful transparency remains contested. In Germany, the landscape is notably fragmented: no federal-level register exists, yet at least five state- and federal-level initiatives publish information about AI systems with varying scopes and objectives. A recent conceptual propos
Record details
Published: 1 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv · 17 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
Unfit for stranding assessment: a panel-scale multimodal-LLM audit of building-decarbonisation disclosure (BeDA)
arXiv cs.CY · 27 July 2026
Anthropic models will soon inject watermarks identifying AI-generated text
Fast Company Tech · 11 August 2026
Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 June 2026), “Are Algorithm Registers Transparent? Perspectives from Germany,” evidence record 3282, https://ethics.ai/record/3282 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.