How high-school pressure and autonomy support are linked to dual AI learning pathways: A cross-contextual SEM analysis
Publication date: June 2026 Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 10 Author(s): Shen Qinjie, Wynn Arunrugstichai
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Modelling individual participants as LLM agents in collaborative problem solving simulations
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Designing large language model-based agents with 5E framework for ESL learners’ grammar acquisition
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Designing conversational Agents for adaptive instructional support in business simulation gaming
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
ASTRA: A synthetic benchmark for trace-based evaluation of socially intelligent multi-agent tutoring and participation-balanced collaboration in introductory programming
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Diagnosing and Calibrating Tool-Call Boundary Drift in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 14 July 2026
Learning Engagement Assistant (LEA): Cross-Course Scalability and Classroom Evaluation of an Agentic AI Tutoring System
arXiv cs.HC · 15 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “How high-school pressure and autonomy support are linked to dual AI learning pathways: A cross-contextual SEM analysis,” evidence record 2295, https://ethics.ai/record/2295 (originally published by Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.