Corrigendum to “Does post disclosure inquiry based supervision crowd out green innovation? Evidence from stock exchange inquiry letters in China” [Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 230 (2026) 124770:1–14/ID: TFS-D-25-10815]
Publication date: Available online 10 June 2026 Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change Author(s): Min Hong, Jingqi Shi, Manjiang Xing, Yuzhi Zhong
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Does post disclosure inquiry based supervision crowd out green innovation? Evidence from stock exchange inquiry letters in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Regulatory science, earnings management, and stock price crash risk: Evidence from disclosure-oriented supervision in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
How rationale and process transparency shape perceived legitimacy in AI-assisted decisions: Experimental evidence from China and the United States
Government Information Quarterly · 14 July 2026
Accountable yet Anonymous AI Agents - Split-Knowledge Binding in National Agent-Identity Layer in China
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Cultural Targets, Structural Frames, Binding Morals: A Cross-Lingual Audit of Online Hate in Multicultural Singapore
arXiv · 20 June 2026
JieZi: A Large-Scale Expert-Audited Dataset and Benchmark for Ancient Chinese Character Exegesis
arXiv · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Corrigendum to “Does post disclosure inquiry based supervision crowd out green innovation? Evidence from stock exchange inquiry letters in China” [Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 230 (2026) 124770:1–14/ID: TFS-D-25-10815],” evidence record 2284, https://ethics.ai/record/2284 (originally published by Technological Forecasting and Social Change).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.