How rationale and process transparency shape perceived legitimacy in AI-assisted decisions: Experimental evidence from China and the United States
Publication date: June 2026 Source: Government Information Quarterly, Volume 43, Issue 2 Author(s): Shangrui Wang, Yuanmeng Zhang, Zhenming Huang, Zheng Liang
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Government Information Quarterly
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Corrigendum to “Does post disclosure inquiry based supervision crowd out green innovation? Evidence from stock exchange inquiry letters in China” [Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 230 (2026) 124770:1–14/ID: TFS-D-25-10815]
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Does post disclosure inquiry based supervision crowd out green innovation? Evidence from stock exchange inquiry letters in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Regulatory science, earnings management, and stock price crash risk: Evidence from disclosure-oriented supervision in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv · 17 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Scrutable State
arXiv cs.CY · 27 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “How rationale and process transparency shape perceived legitimacy in AI-assisted decisions: Experimental evidence from China and the United States,” evidence record 2026, https://ethics.ai/record/2026 (originally published by Government Information Quarterly).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.