Why do people resist mobile health applications? Understanding public resistance intention through extended innovation resistance theory
Publication date: October 2026 Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 231 Author(s): Pei-Hsuan Tsai, Wen-Hsuan Lo
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Optimal financing design for drug development firms
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
GNN-driven modeling and prediction of multi-dimensional correlation of international medical education quality based on competence
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Predicting and explaining professionalism issues in medical students with time-to-event models: An exploratory longitudinal learning analytics study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Personalized neural cognitive architecture search: AutoML-driven diagnostic model generation for heterogeneous learner profiles
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
A comparative analysis of virtual and human influencers in sensory endorsements: A Schema Congruity and Cue Diagnosticity Theory perspective
Technology in Society · 14 July 2026
Enhancing domain adaptation of LLM via model composition in solving medical exam questions
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Why do people resist mobile health applications? Understanding public resistance intention through extended innovation resistance theory,” evidence record 2213, https://ethics.ai/record/2213 (originally published by Technological Forecasting and Social Change).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.