A comparative analysis of virtual and human influencers in sensory endorsements: A Schema Congruity and Cue Diagnosticity Theory perspective
Publication date: August 2026 Source: Technology in Society, Volume 87 Author(s): Yousra Bakr, Hakim Meshreki, Mennatallah ElKashif
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Technology in Society
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Optimal financing design for drug development firms
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
GNN-driven modeling and prediction of multi-dimensional correlation of international medical education quality based on competence
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Predicting and explaining professionalism issues in medical students with time-to-event models: An exploratory longitudinal learning analytics study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Why do people resist mobile health applications? Understanding public resistance intention through extended innovation resistance theory
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Personalized neural cognitive architecture search: AutoML-driven diagnostic model generation for heterogeneous learner profiles
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Enhancing domain adaptation of LLM via model composition in solving medical exam questions
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “A comparative analysis of virtual and human influencers in sensory endorsements: A Schema Congruity and Cue Diagnosticity Theory perspective,” evidence record 2164, https://ethics.ai/record/2164 (originally published by Technology in Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.