The “Gold Rush” in AI and robotics patenting activity. Do innovation systems have a role?
Publication date: October 2026 Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 231 Author(s): Giovanni Guidetti, Riccardo Leoncini, Mariele Macaluso
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Modelling individual participants as LLM agents in collaborative problem solving simulations
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Designing large language model-based agents with 5E framework for ESL learners’ grammar acquisition
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How high-school pressure and autonomy support are linked to dual AI learning pathways: A cross-contextual SEM analysis
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Retraction notice to “AI-generated agents with expert personas in biotechnology: Delphi evaluation of emerging technologies and future trajectories” [Technol. Forecasting & Social Change 227 (2026) 124621]
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Designing conversational Agents for adaptive instructional support in business simulation gaming
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How technological progress in robotics, AI, and IT/ICT/IoT reshapes employment: A robust analysis for the United States
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “The “Gold Rush” in AI and robotics patenting activity. Do innovation systems have a role?,” evidence record 2179, https://ethics.ai/record/2179 (originally published by Technological Forecasting and Social Change).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.