Dual Spatial-Temporal Attribution: Architecture-Aligned Post-Hoc Explainability for Recurrent Graph Anomaly Detection
Deep learning detectors for anomalies in dynamic graphs have reached strong accuracy, yet they remain opaque: when an edge is flagged, the analyst receives a score but no reason. This opacity is untenable in the cooperative, regulated information systems where such detectors are deployed, where automated decisions must be auditable and trustworthy. We address this gap for AddGraph, the foundational GCN+GRU framework for edge-level anomaly detection in dynamic graphs, which to our knowledge has n
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
arXiv · 12 August 2026
Silent Updates: Measuring and Closing the Post-Deployment Disclosure Gap
arXiv · 12 August 2026
Toward Meaningful Transparency for AI Chatbots: Disclosing Persuasive Intent Reduces Persuasion
arXiv cs.HC · 12 August 2026
Beyond Memory: A Transactional Continuity Kernel for Long-Lived AI Agents
arXiv · 12 August 2026
Who Gets Heeded? An Obligation-Level Audit of Responsiveness in EPA Rulemaking
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Dual Spatial-Temporal Attribution: Architecture-Aligned Post-Hoc Explainability for Recurrent Graph Anomaly Detection,” evidence record 19480, https://ethics.ai/record/19480 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.