Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
arXiv:2608.12166v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithm registers have been championed as a means of providing transparency on the use of algorithms in public services. Yet potential publics differ in their expectations of what should be made transparent and how, as well as in their interest in and ability to parse the information currently published in the registers. Moreover, it remains unclear how these instruments can represent the sociotechnical systems in which these algorithms are embed
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Silent Updates: Measuring and Closing the Post-Deployment Disclosure Gap
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Toward Meaningful Transparency for AI Chatbots: Disclosing Persuasive Intent Reduces Persuasion
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Dual Spatial-Temporal Attribution: Architecture-Aligned Post-Hoc Explainability for Recurrent Graph Anomaly Detection
arXiv cs.LG · 12 August 2026
Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
arXiv · 12 August 2026
Silent Updates: Measuring and Closing the Post-Deployment Disclosure Gap
arXiv · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers,” evidence record 18721, https://ethics.ai/record/18721 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.