The Illusion of Improvement: Reject Inference Strategies in Credit Scoring
arXiv:2606.18479v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reject inference methods are widely used to mitigate survival bias in credit scoring, yet their effectiveness remains poorly understood. We systematically evaluate several such methods and uncover a structural failure mode: in a natural retraining cycle, models whose accuracy improves while recall collapses create an illusion of improvement that leads practitioners to believe the system is getting better when, in fact, its rejection quali
Record details
Published: 14 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Algorithmic Gender Prediction Is Illegitimate, But Gender Imputation Can Yield Valid Measurements
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
Applied and Filtered: An End-to-End Algorithmic Fairness Audit of A Public Employment Agency
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
From Fair Representation to Just Recognition in Generative AI
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
Reassessing demographic bias in face attribute classification: a statistically grounded multi-model evaluation on FairFace and UTKFace
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 14 August 2026
Language Models as a Challenge for Business Ethics – A Partially Open-Source Approach
Science and Engineering Ethics · 14 August 2026
Algorithmic Gender Prediction Is Illegitimate, But Gender Imputation Can Yield Valid Measurements
arXiv · 13 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 August 2026), “The Illusion of Improvement: Reject Inference Strategies in Credit Scoring,” evidence record 19130, https://ethics.ai/record/19130 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.