Language Models as a Challenge for Business Ethics – A Partially Open-Source Approach
Large language models have become central infrastructures of contemporary digital economies while raising persistent ethical concerns regarding linguistic inequality, opacity, data governance, and the concentration of technological power. Much of the current debate on AI ethics focuses on normative principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability. While these principles remain essential, they often do not sufficiently explain why ethically problematic outcomes persist under competit
Record details
Published: 14 August 2026
Source: Science and Engineering Ethics
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 15 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Manipulation-Proof Oblivious Audits against Deceptive Model Providers
arXiv · 5 August 2026
AIDLC–governance indicator framework: a lifecycle-based approach to institutional AI governance
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
Financial Audit Assistance using Misinformation Detection and Explanation
arXiv · 20 July 2026
Sequential Fairness Auditing with Limited Output Access
arXiv · 29 June 2026
A Variational Framework for LLM Generator-Regulator Games
arXiv · 16 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 August 2026), “Language Models as a Challenge for Business Ethics – A Partially Open-Source Approach,” evidence record 19549, https://ethics.ai/record/19549 (originally published by Science and Engineering Ethics).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.