Evidence record 13177 · automatically gathered

Sympoietic creativity and the boundaries of qing : digital romance writers negotiating generative AI

This study investigates how writers of high-velocity Chinese digital romance fiction negotiate the arrival of generative AI at the desk. Drawing on a 4-year multi-sited digital ethnography (2021–2025) and interviews with 34 writers on Jinjiang Literature City alongside sustained forum observation and platform-discourse analysis, this article tracks how authors of serial romance work under the time discipline of the daily-update treadmill in the presence of large language models (LLMs). I argue t

Record details

Published: 24 July 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 25 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (24 July 2026), “Sympoietic creativity and the boundaries of qing : digital romance writers negotiating generative AI,” evidence record 13177, https://ethics.ai/record/13177 (originally published by AI & Society).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.