CanniUplift: A Holistic Framework for Mitigating Seller and Incentive Cannibalization in E-commerce Uplift Modeling
Personalized incentive allocation is vital for e-commerce, where uplift modeling is the standard for estimating Individual Treatment Effects (ITE). However, traditional models often fail in complex multi-seller environments with violations of the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA). We identify two critical challenges: Seller-level Cannibalization, where incentives shift expenditure between shops without growing the platform, and Incentive-level Cannibalization, where organic conversi
Record details
Published: 6 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Relational Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing in High-Speed Railway Markets
arXiv · 6 July 2026
Multiplayer Interactive World Models with Representation Autoencoders
arXiv · 6 July 2026
Narrow surveillance: Preserving privacy in AI-based safety monitoring in public spaces
Big Data & Society · 6 July 2026
To Retain or to Adapt? Generalizing Continual Learning
arXiv · 6 July 2026
Social cognitive architecture for NPC groups: integration of transformer theory of mind and hierarchical reinforcement learning
Artificial Intelligence Review · 7 July 2026
Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 July 2026), “CanniUplift: A Holistic Framework for Mitigating Seller and Incentive Cannibalization in E-commerce Uplift Modeling,” evidence record 191, https://ethics.ai/record/191 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.