Relational Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing in High-Speed Railway Markets
In liberalised railway systems, operators must set prices dynamically in an environment with partial observability, as they retain private information about their objectives and performance, where regulatory constraints prohibit communication or direct information exchange between competitors to prevent explicit collusion. Consequently, agents must learn to infer strategic interactions only from observable market data which presents a significant challenge for multi-agent reinforcement learning,
Record details
Published: 6 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Agentic-V2X: Small Language Model Agents for Deadline-Aware V2X Scheduling in 5G/6G Networks
arXiv · 5 July 2026
SolarChain-Eval: A Physics-Constrained Benchmark for Trustworthy Economic Agents in Decentralized Energy Markets
arXiv · 9 July 2026
AI-Native Insurance for Agentic AI: Pricing, Underwriting, and End-to-End Automation
arXiv · 14 July 2026
Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 15 July 2026
SEED: Self-Evolving On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 15 July 2026
AI-Native Insurance for Agentic AI: Pricing, Underwriting, and End-to-End Automation
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 July 2026), “Relational Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing in High-Speed Railway Markets,” evidence record 194, https://ethics.ai/record/194 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.