Variable Selection in the Context of AI Fairness
Fairness in AI systems has become more important with recent regulatory demands, such as the EU AI Act. Traditional approaches often do not take into account philosophical ethics and social awareness. Variable selection processes, in particular, can introduce implicit bias, affecting equity across different subgroups. We discuss a mathematical approach that evaluates fairness in AI, aligning mathematical methodologies with ethical considerations and regulatory requirements. Our aim is to advocat
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv fairness query
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Variable Selection in the Context of AI Fairness
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
Traceable by Design: An LLM Pipeline and Dashboard for EU Regulatory Consultation Analysis
arXiv · 29 May 2026
How Supply Chain Dependencies Complicate Bias Measurement and Accountability Attribution in AI Hiring Applications
arXiv · 24 April 2026
First, Do No Harm (With LLMs): Mitigating Racial Bias via Agentic Workflows
arXiv · 20 April 2026
A pragmatic approach to regulating AI agents
arXiv · 16 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Variable Selection in the Context of AI Fairness,” evidence record 19056, https://ethics.ai/record/19056 (originally published by arXiv fairness query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.