First, Do No Harm (With LLMs): Mitigating Racial Bias via Agentic Workflows
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in clinical settings, raising concerns about racial bias in both generated medical text and clinical reasoning. Existing studies have identified bias in medical LLMs, but many focus on single models and give less attention to mitigation. This study uses the EU AI Act as a governance lens to evaluate five widely used LLMs across two tasks, namely synthetic patient-case generation and differential diagnosis ranking. Using race-stratified epidemiol
Record details
Published: 20 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?
arXiv · 15 June 2026
A pragmatic approach to regulating AI agents
arXiv · 16 April 2026
AI Agents Under EU Law
arXiv · 6 April 2026
Governed Auditable Decisioning Under Uncertainty: Synthesis and Agentic Extension
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Four-Axis Decision Alignment for Long-Horizon Enterprise AI Agents
arXiv · 21 April 2026
GeoMind: An Agentic Workflow for Lithology Classification with Reasoned Tool Invocation
arXiv · 23 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 April 2026), “First, Do No Harm (With LLMs): Mitigating Racial Bias via Agentic Workflows,” evidence record 5616, https://ethics.ai/record/5616 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.