Ethics Practices in AI Development: An Empirical Study Across Roles and Regions
arXiv:2508.09219v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in AI applications have raised growing concerns about the need for ethical guidelines and regulations to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies. In this paper, we present a mixed-methods survey study - combining statistical and qualitative analyses - to examine the ethical perceptions, practices, and knowledge of individuals involved in various AI development roles. Our survey comprises 414 participants from 43 countries
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Small Data Explainer -- The impact of small data methods in everyday life
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Why AI Detection Fails for Academic Integrity
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Silent Updates: Measuring and Closing the Post-Deployment Disclosure Gap
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Toward Meaningful Transparency for AI Chatbots: Disclosing Persuasive Intent Reduces Persuasion
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “Ethics Practices in AI Development: An Empirical Study Across Roles and Regions,” evidence record 18732, https://ethics.ai/record/18732 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.