Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv:2608.11344v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial institutions are delegating consequential decisions to agentic AI systems that decompose goals, coordinate models and tools, and act with little oversight. Yet agentic AI governance in FinTech is under-investigated. We argue the binding governance constraint is not capability but verifiability. We define the Verifiability Gap as the shortfall between the verification delegated authority demands and the explainability and reproducibility r
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Transparency · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Narmi releases AI to streamline account opening for communitty banks and credit unions
Finextra AI · 13 July 2026
Beyond Memory: A Transactional Continuity Kernel for Long-Lived AI Agents
arXiv · 12 August 2026
WebRider: Persona-Conditioned Intent Controllers for Live-Web Assistance
arXiv cs.HC · 7 August 2026
Beyond Top-K: Replacing Black-Box Retrieval with Interpretable Agentic Operations
arXiv · 6 August 2026
From Siloed Algorithms to Compliance-First Agentic Platforms: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Hospital AI Systems
arXiv · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “Governing Agentic AI in FinTech,” evidence record 18713, https://ethics.ai/record/18713 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.