Public support for misinformation interventions depends on perceived fairness, effectiveness, and intrusiveness
arXiv:2508.05849v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The proliferation of misinformation on social media has concerning possible consequences, such as the degradation of democratic norms. While recent research on countering misinformation has largely focused on analyzing the effectiveness of interventions, the factors associated with public support for these interventions have received little attention. We asked 1,010 American social media users to rate their support for and perceptions of ten mi
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Misinformation
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Unequal Verdicts: Investigating Gender Bias in LLM-Based Fake News Detection
arXiv · 4 August 2026
Visual Indicators to Increase the Detection of Linguistic Media Bias
arXiv cs.HC · 22 July 2026
Financial Audit Assistance using Misinformation Detection and Explanation
arXiv · 20 July 2026
What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection
arXiv · 10 July 2026
Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Affective AI Safety: The Missing Piece in LLM Safety
arXiv · 22 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “Public support for misinformation interventions depends on perceived fairness, effectiveness, and intrusiveness,” evidence record 18731, https://ethics.ai/record/18731 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.