Affective AI Safety: The Missing Piece in LLM Safety
AI safety research has focused predominantly on epistemic and physical harms (e.g., misinformation, bias, system reliability) while the risks that arise from AI systems' engagement with human emotional life have remained fragmented and undertheorised. We propose affective safety as a unified class of AI safety concerns grounded in the fact that humans are affective beings. We develop a taxonomy of affective harms and identify recurring harm types: (1) affective self-alienation, (2) fairness and
Record details
Published: 22 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Misinformation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SAVe: Self-Supervised Audio-visual Deepfake Detection Exploiting Visual Artifacts and Audio-visual Misalignment
arXiv · 26 March 2026
MMed-Bench-IR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Multilingual Medical Information Retrieval
arXiv · 23 June 2026
Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Pulling The REINS: Training-Free Safety Alignment of Video Diffusion Models via Representation Steering
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Decoupling Semantics from Distortions: Multi-Scale Two-Stream Vision-Language Alignment for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment
arXiv · 15 June 2026
ADAPT: Attention Dynamics Alignment with Preference Tuning for Faithful MLLMs
arXiv · 30 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 June 2026), “Affective AI Safety: The Missing Piece in LLM Safety,” evidence record 697, https://ethics.ai/record/697 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.