Unequal Verdicts: Investigating Gender Bias in LLM-Based Fake News Detection
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated fact-checking, yet their susceptibility to gender bias in this context remains underexplored. This study presents the first systematic investigation of gender bias in LLM-based fake news detection using real-world data. We augment the LIAR benchmark with three gender variants of speaker job titles (Neutral, Male, Female) for each statement to test whether veracity judgments vary solely based on gender presentation. Six state-of-the
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Jobs & economy · Misinformation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection
arXiv · 10 July 2026
Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies
OpenAlex · 26 December 2023
How do California’s gubernatorial candidates stack up on AI & tech policy?
StateScoop · 3 August 2026
Visa is buying BioCatch for $2.4 billion because AI scams now cost the global economy $1 trillion a year
The Next Web AI · 3 August 2026
The Elusiveness of Merit-Based Hiring
MIT Sloan Management Review AI · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Unequal Verdicts: Investigating Gender Bias in LLM-Based Fake News Detection,” evidence record 16276, https://ethics.ai/record/16276 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.