Stay or Stray - A Dynamical Systems Viewpoint of Popularity Bias
Popularity bias in recommendation systems arises when a majority user class generates disproportionate interaction data, causing the system to increasingly favour it while degrading recommendation quality for niche users. While extensive empirical evidence of popularity bias exists, the dynamics leading to its emergence are not well understood. In this work, we study the coupled evolution of recommender model updates and user engagement through the lens of dynamical systems. We formulate a stoch
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
IADD-TR: Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling with Targeted Regularization for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.LG · 11 August 2026
Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
Fairness in Link Prediction Beyond Demographic Parity: A Reproducibility Study
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
Agentic Harnesses: LLM-Driven Verification Layers for Robot Autonomy
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Confusion-Geometry Rebalancing for Long-Tailed Adversarial Training
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
Prioritizing Equity in Design and Implementation of Consumer-Facing Digital Resources to Support Engagement and Shared Decision-Making
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Stay or Stray - A Dynamical Systems Viewpoint of Popularity Bias,” evidence record 18669, https://ethics.ai/record/18669 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.