Prioritizing Equity in Design and Implementation of Consumer-Facing Digital Resources to Support Engagement and Shared Decision-Making
A digitally enabled health system offers the opportunity to address gaps in the implementation of shared decision-making, a collaborative process between health professionals and consumers to decide on the best test, treatment, or management option based on clinical evidence and the consumer’s values and informed preferences. There is increasing design and availability of digital tools online to support shared decision-making. Providing opportunities for all consumers to make shared health care
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Distribution Mapping Approach to Counterfactually Fair Reinforcement Learning
arXiv fairness query · 9 August 2026
H2AL: Hyperbolic Hierarchy-aware Aggregative Learning for Registration-based Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation
arXiv cs.AI · 7 August 2026
GoT-CD: Graph-of-Thoughts Causal Discovery and the Fragility of Post-hoc Path-Specific Fairness Audits
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
Trustworthy AI in Digital Health: A Comprehensive Review of Robustness and Explainability
arXiv · 3 August 2026
KAISEN: Reproducible Subgroup Fairness Auditing for Clinical Risk Models
arXiv cs.LG · 30 July 2026
Fairness Interventions in Classification: A Study on AI Explainability
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Prioritizing Equity in Design and Implementation of Consumer-Facing Digital Resources to Support Engagement and Shared Decision-Making,” evidence record 18486, https://ethics.ai/record/18486 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.