Confusion-Geometry Rebalancing for Long-Tailed Adversarial Training
Adversarial training under long tailed distributions suffers from a dual imbalance: the class imbalance skews the training objective toward head classes, and the adversarial inner maximization may further amplify this bias. Existing methods mitigate this issue by correcting class priors or adapting class wise robust supervision, yet they treat each class in isolation and fail to identify which boundaries drive long tailed collapse. We propose a Confusion Geometry Rebalancing method (CGRm) for lo
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Agentic Harnesses: LLM-Driven Verification Layers for Robot Autonomy
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Fairness in Link Prediction Beyond Demographic Parity: A Reproducibility Study
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
Beyond Binary: Continuous State Optimization with Graph-Structured Objectives
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
FedTVD: Balancing Data Quality and Quantity for Robust Federated Learning
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Let's Unlearn Stereotypes Before Decision-Making: Assessing the Impact of Intrinsic Bias Mitigation on Downstream Fairness in LLMs
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Confusion-Geometry Rebalancing for Long-Tailed Adversarial Training,” evidence record 18264, https://ethics.ai/record/18264 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.