Multiclass Sentiment Analysis for Identifying Political Viewpoints
The rapid growth of social media has created vast amounts of political discourse, which provides valuable opportunities to analyze public opinions and identify different political perspectives. Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a core task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) that allows the computational study of attitudes and opinions in textual data, and has become increasingly important for understanding political discourse. In this work, we investigate multiclass sentiment analysis of political vi
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv · 11 August 2026
A Machine Learning Pipeline to Analyze Global Sentiment and Factors Influencing Retinoblastoma Treatment Hesitancy: Observational Infodemiology Study
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 11 August 2026
Social Media Influencer Marketing as a Clinical Trial Recruitment Modality: Tutorial Informed by One Study’s Approach
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 11 August 2026
Conflict and Congruency Effects in Large Language Models: In-Weight and In-Context Competition in a Verbal Conflict Task
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Digital decoupling: educational stratification and dual-track effects of AI displacement and augmentation in U.S. occupations
AI & Society · 12 August 2026
Self-referential consistency in stateless language models: a behavioral perspective
AI & Society · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Multiclass Sentiment Analysis for Identifying Political Viewpoints,” evidence record 18655, https://ethics.ai/record/18655 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.