Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
Can AI systems be aligned to human values? The popularization of large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal foundation models has seen a rise in harms spanning from toxic speech and hallucinations to AI agents executing unauthorized actions. Within the field of AI safety, these harmful instances are often framed as the alignment problem, or of models being misaligned with human values. Researchers have responded by pursuing applied and theoretical AI value alignment efforts, often without spec
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
Agentic Harnesses: LLM-Driven Verification Layers for Robot Autonomy
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem
arXiv · 10 August 2026
REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems
arXiv red teaming query · 11 August 2026
MELLON - Multimodal Enhanced LLM for Online Navigation
arXiv · 10 August 2026
AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization
arXiv · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment,” evidence record 18434, https://ethics.ai/record/18434 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.