Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem
AI agents increasingly work inside systems that govern how they delegate tasks, move information, execute actions, and use shared resources. Recent work already shows that deployment rules can change collective behavior. Here we ask which parts of an AI institution produce safety and how they do it. This is the first paper from POLIS, an ongoing research programme studying algorithmic institutions for multi-agent systems. We report a frozen 5,280-episode study suite. The main pre-specified deleg
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Agentic Harnesses: LLM-Driven Verification Layers for Robot Autonomy
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 10 August 2026
Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
arXiv · 10 August 2026
MELLON - Multimodal Enhanced LLM for Online Navigation
arXiv · 10 August 2026
REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems
arXiv red teaming query · 11 August 2026
AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization
arXiv · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem,” evidence record 18000, https://ethics.ai/record/18000 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.