Patients With Personality: Realistic Patient Simulation through Controlled Diversity and Selective Disclosure
arXiv:2606.17441v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Simulating realistic patient interactions is a key requirement to testing clinical applications of LLMs at scale without time-consuming and expensive user studies. However, existing approaches often lack realism and controllability, often oversharing information unprompted, and failing to capture the wide variability of patient behavior. Here, we introduce PatientsWithPersonality (PWP), a patient simulation framework that generates realis
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Unmasking Toxic Mimicry in Medical Offline Reinforcement Learning for ICU Sepsis Management via Counterfactual Clinical Audits
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
CAPRI: Contract-Aware Proof Repair for Isabelle
arXiv cs.AI · 13 August 2026
An Explainable GNN Framework for Component-Level Anomaly Diagnosis
arXiv · 10 August 2026
SHRIMP: Iterative Refinement of Robot Task Plans
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
A survey of deep multivariate time-series models with an empirical reproducibility audit
Artificial Intelligence Review · 9 August 2026
SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic Verification
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Patients With Personality: Realistic Patient Simulation through Controlled Diversity and Selective Disclosure,” evidence record 18373, https://ethics.ai/record/18373 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.