A survey of deep multivariate time-series models with an empirical reproducibility audit
Multivariate time series (MTS) analysis is increasingly important for extracting insights from complex, interdependent temporal data in domains such as healthcare, finance, and industrial monitoring. Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved MTS modeling; yet, the rapidly expanding literature remains fragmented across tasks, architectures, and evaluation practices. This survey concentrates on deep learning-centric approaches in MTS research across seven key tasks: classificati
Record details
Published: 9 August 2026
Source: Artificial Intelligence Review
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 10 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic Verification
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 August 2026
SHRIMP: Iterative Refinement of Robot Task Plans
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
An Explainable GNN Framework for Component-Level Anomaly Diagnosis
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Human-Centered Explainable AI for TinyML Edge Devices: A Pareto-Based Selection Framework with LLM-Guided Design
arXiv cs.HC · 7 August 2026
Plausible Patients, Impossible Populations: Auditing Epidemiological Fidelity in Large Language Model Mental Health Simulations
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
Auditing Sex/Gender Disparities in Emergency Triage with LLM-based Paired Comparisons
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 August 2026), “A survey of deep multivariate time-series models with an empirical reproducibility audit,” evidence record 17855, https://ethics.ai/record/17855 (originally published by Artificial Intelligence Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.