An Explainable GNN Framework for Component-Level Anomaly Diagnosis
Industrial processes are complex systems composed of multiple interacting sensors that generate multivariate time series (MTS). Detecting anomalies in such systems is critical for reliability and safety, yet understanding their origin is equally important. Existing Graph Neural Network (GNN)based methods for anomaly detection primarily focus on sensor-level deviations and either attribute anomalies directly to the deviating sensors. When diagnosis is attempted, generally, the most deviated senso
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SHRIMP: Iterative Refinement of Robot Task Plans
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
A survey of deep multivariate time-series models with an empirical reproducibility audit
Artificial Intelligence Review · 9 August 2026
SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic Verification
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 August 2026
Patients With Personality: Realistic Patient Simulation through Controlled Diversity and Selective Disclosure
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Unmasking Toxic Mimicry in Medical Offline Reinforcement Learning for ICU Sepsis Management via Counterfactual Clinical Audits
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Human-Centered Explainable AI for TinyML Edge Devices: A Pareto-Based Selection Framework with LLM-Guided Design
arXiv cs.HC · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “An Explainable GNN Framework for Component-Level Anomaly Diagnosis,” evidence record 18021, https://ethics.ai/record/18021 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.