The GenAI Catch-22: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Norwegian Newsrooms During the 2025 Parliamentary Election
arXiv:2608.10773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The increasing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in journalism raises concerns about possible detrimental effects both on journalism and its democratic function. We explore these risks through a case study of GenAI in Norwegian Newsrooms during the 2025 parliamentary election campaign. Based on interviews with managers and journalists over a ten-month period, we analyse how ambitious visions fared in the face of technological and pr
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Misinformation
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026
Is Misinformation More Open? A Study of robots.txt Gatekeeping on the Web
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Public support for misinformation interventions depends on perceived fairness, effectiveness, and intrusiveness
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Angry but Accurate: Detecting and Profiling the Counter-Misinformation Ecosystem on Twitter
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Multi-Agent Forensic Reasoning for Generalizable Deepfake Video Detection
arXiv · 7 August 2026
From Cheap Fakes to Pure Synthesis: Addressing the New Era of T2V Fake News Videos
arXiv · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “The GenAI Catch-22: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Norwegian Newsrooms During the 2025 Parliamentary Election,” evidence record 18353, https://ethics.ai/record/18353 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.