ColluSkill: Adversarial Cross-Skill Composition for Evading Agent Skill Scanners
Agent skills are emerging as an important attack surface in LLM-based agent systems. Through an empirical study of existing skill scanners, we find that current defenses mainly inspect individual skills, leaving risks from cross-skill composition insufficiently examined. This creates a practical blind spot: multiple locally plausible skills may pass security checks while collectively forming a harmful workflow during agent execution. To investigate this threat, we propose ColluSkill, a collusive
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Graphing the Everyday: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Eliciting Routines for Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions
arXiv cs.HC · 10 August 2026
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Effect of a robotic insole-type active assist device on horizontal ground reaction force and center-of-pressure stability during stepping in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis
Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 12 August 2026
Is Misinformation More Open? A Study of robots.txt Gatekeeping on the Web
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Social Facilitation of Creative Reflection: AI-agents and Humans
arXiv cs.HC · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “ColluSkill: Adversarial Cross-Skill Composition for Evading Agent Skill Scanners,” evidence record 18262, https://ethics.ai/record/18262 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.