Auditing Sex/Gender Disparities in Emergency Triage with LLM-based Paired Comparisons
arXiv:2511.17124v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present a domain-agnostic paired-comparison approach that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to quantify sex/gender-related asymmetries in documented clinical decision-making. The method trains an LLM to emulate observed decisions, then evaluates sex-swapped pairs in which only sex is flipped, holding documented clinical content constant. We apply it to emergency triage, analyzing more than 140,000 Bordeaux University Hospital (France) admiss
Record details
Published: 7 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Plausible Patients, Impossible Populations: Auditing Epidemiological Fidelity in Large Language Model Mental Health Simulations
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
Human-Centered Explainable AI for TinyML Edge Devices: A Pareto-Based Selection Framework with LLM-Guided Design
arXiv cs.HC · 7 August 2026
Adaptive Arena-based Contestable Argumentative Network-of-Experts for Open-Ended Care Plan Coordination
arXiv · 5 August 2026
SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic Verification
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 August 2026
A survey of deep multivariate time-series models with an empirical reproducibility audit
Artificial Intelligence Review · 9 August 2026
Beyond Simulations: What 20,000 Real Conversations Reveal About Mental Health AI Safety
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Auditing Sex/Gender Disparities in Emergency Triage with LLM-based Paired Comparisons,” evidence record 17022, https://ethics.ai/record/17022 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.