Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests
We propose Zero-phase Component Analysis (ZCA) whitening as a geometric pre-processing step for the Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT). WEAT is a bias measurement method widely used in both computational social science and AI fairness research. It relies on cosine similarity as a measure of semantic association, which assumes that the embedding space is approximately isotropic. However, prior work has reported that many widely used language models do not satisfy this assumption, raising conc
Record details
Published: 7 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 10 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Stream Learning: Partition-Fair Gossip Learning Without Tokens
arXiv fairness query · 7 August 2026
Conditional Cognitive Biases in LLMs: How Biased User Turns Modulate In-Context Reasoning
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
Who Gets Access? Global Region and Academic Status Bias in AI-Generated Academic Gatekeeping Scenarios
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
H2AL: Hyperbolic Hierarchy-aware Aggregative Learning for Registration-based Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation
arXiv cs.AI · 7 August 2026
Fairis: Fairness-Aware Aggregation with Provable Influence Containment against Fairness Poisoning Attacks in Collaborative Machine Learning
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests,” evidence record 17819, https://ethics.ai/record/17819 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.