Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests
arXiv:2608.06908v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose Zero-phase Component Analysis (ZCA) whitening as a geometric pre-processing step for the Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT). WEAT is a bias measurement method widely used in both computational social science and AI fairness research. It relies on cosine similarity as a measure of semantic association, which assumes that the embedding space is approximately isotropic. However, prior work has reported that many widely used language m
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 10 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests
arXiv · 7 August 2026
Let's Unlearn Stereotypes Before Decision-Making: Assessing the Impact of Intrinsic Bias Mitigation on Downstream Fairness in LLMs
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Critical Acclaim Orientation in Large Language Models: Evidence from Film Preference Elicitation
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
F2STNet: Fair and Federated Spectral-Temporal Modeling for Graph Forecasting
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
FedTVD: Balancing Data Quality and Quantity for Robust Federated Learning
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Beyond Binary: Continuous State Optimization with Graph-Structured Objectives
arXiv fairness query · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests,” evidence record 17762, https://ethics.ai/record/17762 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.