FedTVD: Balancing Data Quality and Quantity for Robust Federated Learning
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed client devices while preserving data privacy. However, FL faces significant challenges due to data heterogeneity, particularly in terms of label distribution skewness and variations in dataset sizes, which can lead to biased model updates and hinder convergence. To address this, we propose FedTVD, a novel FL algorithm that weights client contributions during aggregation by considering both data quality and quantity.
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Privacy
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Designing for rhythm: tempo-setting infrastructures and the temporal conditions of digital life
AI & Society · 13 August 2026
Assessing the Impacts of Imperfect Datasets on Client Selections in Federated Learning
arXiv · 3 August 2026
Trustworthy AI in Digital Health: A Comprehensive Review of Robustness and Explainability
arXiv · 3 August 2026
Ethical use of artificial intelligence in education: proposed ethical competency framework for teachers
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 3 August 2026
Exploratory Integration of EEG Spectral Features and Gaze Variability for Mild Cognitive Impairment Discrimination
arXiv cs.HC · 31 July 2026
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv cs.CY · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “FedTVD: Balancing Data Quality and Quantity for Robust Federated Learning,” evidence record 18024, https://ethics.ai/record/18024 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.