Evidence record 17760 · automatically gathered

Against Explainable Artificial Intelligence In Law: Why Justifiable Ai Matters. A Credit Scoring Example

arXiv:2608.07452v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence-based solutions offer new efficiency-increasing possibilities in many applications, including credit scoring. Yet, the increasing sophistication of machine-learning models in use raises concerns regarding many of their aspects, explainability notwithstanding. We review the relevant EU legal background and integrate this review with insights from technical sciences to interpret relevant legal provisions in the light of techno

Record details

Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 10 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Against Explainable Artificial Intelligence In Law: Why Justifiable Ai Matters. A Credit Scoring Example,” evidence record 17760, https://ethics.ai/record/17760 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.