Evidence record 17495 · automatically gathered

Quantifying the imputation paradox and XAI inconsistency in multi-source diabetes prediction: a 353,680-record leakage-free stacking ensemble with dynamic routing architecture

Diabetes affects 537 million adults globally, a figure projected to reach 783 million by 2045. Despite over 4,200 ML prediction studies, clinical translation remains hindered by an over-reliance on benchmark datasets, unmeasured information costs of multi-source fusion, and untested XAI convergence assumptions. We address these issues by evaluating 353,680 records (from 455,446 candidates) across a Clinical-Biomarker Set (CBS) and a Lifestyle-Survey Set (LSS) using a strict leakage-free protocol

Record details

Published: 7 August 2026
Source: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 8 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Quantifying the imputation paradox and XAI inconsistency in multi-source diabetes prediction: a 353,680-record leakage-free stacking ensemble with dynamic routing architecture,” evidence record 17495, https://ethics.ai/record/17495 (originally published by Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.