Evidence record 17493 · automatically gathered

Gender and diagnostic differences in children’s preferences for social robot design. A mixed-methods study with autistic and neurotypical children

IntroductionAutistic children are increasingly engaging with social robots in educational and support contexts, but limited research has compared the perceptual and design preferences of autistic and neurotypical children.MethodsThis mixed-methods study examined the robot design preferences of 43 children aged 3–15 years, including 21 autistic and 22 neurotypical children, and included semi-structured interviews with 11 adult stakeholders, comprising six experts and five non-experts. Quantitativ

Record details

Published: 7 August 2026
Source: Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 8 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Gender and diagnostic differences in children’s preferences for social robot design. A mixed-methods study with autistic and neurotypical children,” evidence record 17493, https://ethics.ai/record/17493 (originally published by Frontiers in Robotics and AI).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.