Evidence record 17490 · automatically gathered

Zones of (un)certainty: studying the temporal stabilization of ground truths for medical AI

Medical data annotation is a critical yet contingent process that (re)configures ambiguous medical decisions and data representations into ground truths for artificial intelligence (AI). Extending critical data, AI, and STS research on uncertainty in data annotation, this article develops the concept of zones of (un)certainty to capture the epistemic time-spaces through which annotators transform uncertainty and dissonance into stabilized ground-truth data for medical AI. Drawing on interviews w

Record details

Published: 7 August 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 8 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “Zones of (un)certainty: studying the temporal stabilization of ground truths for medical AI,” evidence record 17490, https://ethics.ai/record/17490 (originally published by AI & Society).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.