EduPanel: A Three-Agent LLM Judge for Teaching Videos -- Reliability, Complementarity, and Human Trust Calibration
Teaching videos are becoming a major medium for education, creating a growing need for scalable evaluation of their pedagogical quality. Existing automatic judges do not fully address this setting because teaching quality depends on multimodal evidence and should be evaluated with respect to the intended learner rather than as a universal property. We present EduPanel, a rubric-grounded, learner-conditioned LLM judge that decomposes evaluation across specialized agents to produce interpretable a
Record details
Published: 20 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 3 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
EduPanel: A Three-Agent LLM Judge for Teaching Videos -- Reliability, Complementarity, and Human Trust Calibration
arXiv cs.HC · 20 July 2026
EduPanel: A Three-Agent LLM Judge for Teaching Videos -- Reliability, Complementarity, and Human Trust Calibration
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 19 July 2026
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of Chinas vaccination policy
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
Towards Reducing Foreign Language Anxiety Using Level-Appropriate Embodied Conversational Agents
arXiv cs.HC · 24 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 July 2026), “EduPanel: A Three-Agent LLM Judge for Teaching Videos -- Reliability, Complementarity, and Human Trust Calibration,” evidence record 15794, https://ethics.ai/record/15794 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.