Towards Reducing Foreign Language Anxiety Using Level-Appropriate Embodied Conversational Agents
Foreign language anxiety (FLA) can be a major barrier to second language acquisition (SLA), especially in conversational contexts. With the proliferation of large language models (LLMs) throughout all areas of life, recent work suggests that interacting with LLM agents can be instrumental within the field of SLA and foreign language education, especially for reducing FLA. Related work also suggests that linguistic demands and task complexity can be predictors of FLA, implying that the use of dem
Record details
Published: 24 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
Teachy Mini: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Knowledge-Based Generative Social Robot for Higher Education
arXiv · 24 July 2026
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of Chinas vaccination policy
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
EduPanel: A Three-Agent LLM Judge for Teaching Videos -- Reliability, Complementarity, and Human Trust Calibration
arXiv cs.HC · 20 July 2026
EduPanel: A Three-Agent LLM Judge for Teaching Videos -- Reliability, Complementarity, and Human Trust Calibration
arXiv cs.HC · 20 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 July 2026), “Towards Reducing Foreign Language Anxiety Using Level-Appropriate Embodied Conversational Agents,” evidence record 13720, https://ethics.ai/record/13720 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.