FairFund-Bench: Evaluating Distributive Bias in LLM Resource Allocation
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in the distribution of scarce resources, raising concerns about biased allocations based on characteristics like race and gender. Recent LLM audits have produced inconsistent results, however, finding evidence of both positive and negative discrimination towards women and ethnic minorities, even for the same models. We show that this disagreement can arise from differences in audit format and introduce FairFund-Bench, a benchmark that system
Record details
Published: 31 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Transparency
Retrieved: 3 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv cs.CY · 31 July 2026
Benchmarks Are Not Monolithic: Sample-Level Auditing and Orchestration for LLM Evaluation
arXiv · 30 July 2026
KAISEN: Reproducible Subgroup Fairness Auditing for Clinical Risk Models
arXiv cs.LG · 30 July 2026
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv · 30 July 2026
Fairness Auditing: Lower Bounds on Company Manipulation
arXiv fairness query · 1 August 2026
Fairness Is Not Enough: Auditing Competence and Intersectional Bias in AI-powered Resume Screening
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (31 July 2026), “FairFund-Bench: Evaluating Distributive Bias in LLM Resource Allocation,” evidence record 15686, https://ethics.ai/record/15686 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.