Evidence record 15657 · automatically gathered

Hallucinations in Organization-backed AI advisors: Evidence about Skepticism, Verification, and Reliance in Goal-Directed Use

arXiv:2606.23491v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly used by organizations to deliver information to consumers, patients, students, employees, and citizens. These systems can hallucinate, producing plausible but inaccurate responses. A central question for AI-advised decisions is therefore not only whether users rely on inaccurate information, but whether they recognize that a response may require verification. To answer th

Record details

Published: 3 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 3 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (3 August 2026), “Hallucinations in Organization-backed AI advisors: Evidence about Skepticism, Verification, and Reliance in Goal-Directed Use,” evidence record 15657, https://ethics.ai/record/15657 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.