Evidence record 15410 · automatically gathered

The Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Extended Reality (MCDA-XR) Governance Framework for Health Care Adoption: Mixed Methods Development Study

Background: Health services increasingly face decisions about how to integrate immersive technologies into routine practice. International guidance highlights the need for structured governance in digital health, yet extended reality (XR) initiatives are often launched through isolated pilots without a clear assessment of organizational readiness or implementation risk. Although factors influencing XR adoption are well documented, health care organizations and system-level decision-makers still

Record details

Published: 31 July 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 1 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (31 July 2026), “The Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Extended Reality (MCDA-XR) Governance Framework for Health Care Adoption: Mixed Methods Development Study,” evidence record 15410, https://ethics.ai/record/15410 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.